Filmrezension & Vergleich: Evil Dead

Movie review & comparison: Evil Dead

Plot The remake also takes place in a remote forest cabin where the Necronomicon is unleashed. In contrast to the original, the focus is more on physical horror, trauma and addiction – less on improvised chaos, more on consistent escalation .

Schwarze Gym Bag WITCHES AGAINST V2 mit externe Kordelhalterungen und Hexen-Design
Lars Schmitz

03 January 2026

Movie review & comparison: Evil Dead

Modern brutality vs. raw cult classic

Brief information

  • Title: Evil Dead
  • Year of publication: 2013
  • Directed by Fede Álvarez
  • Genre: Horror · Splatter · Occult
  • Reference: Reboot / Reinterpretation of the classic The Evil Dead
  • Iconic character from the original: Bruce Campbell as Ash Williams

Plot

The remake also takes place in a remote forest cabin where the Necronomicon is unleashed.
In contrast to the original, the focus is more on physical horror, trauma and addiction – less on improvised chaos, more on consistent escalation .

Atmosphere – the biggest difference

Evil Dead (2013)

  • extremely dark & ​​serious

  • high graphic brutality

  • depressive, hopeless mood

  • The forest seems hostile, almost apocalyptic.

  • modern horror aesthetic , uncompromising, nihilistic

The Evil Dead (1981)

  • raw, chaotic, claustrophobic
  • experimental camera movements
  • minimalist means
  • Madness instead of perfection

DIY horror with occult paranoia , unique in its time.

Comparison: Style & Impact

aspect Evil Dead (2013) The Evil Dead (1981)
clay serious & brutal raw & increasingly surreal
horror physical, explicit psychological, escalating
humor none involuntarily, later iconic
occultism dark & ​​ritualistic chaotic & uncontrolled
atmosphere difficult & hopeless claustrophobic & insanity


Bruce Campbell & the Soul of the Original

The biggest emotional difference lies in the absence of Ash Williams .
Bruce Campbell's portrayal in the original brings a human breaking point to the horror: fear, being overwhelmed, and later, black humor.

The 2013 film deliberately avoids this irony – it does not want to entertain, but to wear down .

This makes it more effective for modern audiences, but less iconic.

Occult context & Gothic reference

Both films share:

  • Forbidden books (Necronomicon)

  • Obsession & Dehumanization

  • Isolation as an amplifier of horror

But:

  • 1981 → Occultism as incalculable chaos

  • 2013 → Occultism as ritualized, inescapable damnation

Both are relevant to Gothic and Dark Art aesthetics, but with different emotional effects.

Conclusion

“Evil Dead” (2013) is not a replacement for the original – but a radical reinterpretation.
Where the classic is raw, creative and iconic, the reboot focuses on technical perfection and extreme consistency .

Those seeking atmosphere, madness, and cult status should go for the original.
Those who want modern, uncompromising horror will find a merciless experience in the reboot.

Evaluation:

  • Evil Dead (2013): 8/10 – brutal & effective

  • The Evil Dead (1981) : 10/10 – timeless cult classic

Prev post

Alien: Earth

Alien: Earth

Updated on 03 January 2026

Next post

Filmrezension & Vergleich: Nosferatu

Film review & comparison: Nosferatu

Updated on 03 January 2026

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.