Movie review & comparison: Evil Dead
Plot The remake also takes place in a remote forest cabin where the Necronomicon is unleashed. In contrast to the original, the focus is more on physical horror, trauma and addiction – less on improvised chaos, more on consistent escalation .
03 January 2026
Share
Movie review & comparison: Evil Dead
Modern brutality vs. raw cult classic
Brief information
- Title: Evil Dead
- Year of publication: 2013
- Directed by Fede Álvarez
- Genre: Horror · Splatter · Occult
- Reference: Reboot / Reinterpretation of the classic The Evil Dead
- Iconic character from the original: Bruce Campbell as Ash Williams
Plot
The remake also takes place in a remote forest cabin where the Necronomicon is unleashed.
In contrast to the original, the focus is more on physical horror, trauma and addiction – less on improvised chaos, more on consistent escalation .
Atmosphere – the biggest difference
Evil Dead (2013)
-
extremely dark & serious
-
high graphic brutality
-
depressive, hopeless mood
-
The forest seems hostile, almost apocalyptic.
- modern horror aesthetic , uncompromising, nihilistic
The Evil Dead (1981)
- raw, chaotic, claustrophobic
- experimental camera movements
- minimalist means
- Madness instead of perfection
DIY horror with occult paranoia , unique in its time.
Comparison: Style & Impact
| aspect | Evil Dead (2013) | The Evil Dead (1981) |
|---|---|---|
| clay | serious & brutal | raw & increasingly surreal |
| horror | physical, explicit | psychological, escalating |
| humor | none | involuntarily, later iconic |
| occultism | dark & ritualistic | chaotic & uncontrolled |
| atmosphere | difficult & hopeless | claustrophobic & insanity |
Bruce Campbell & the Soul of the Original
The biggest emotional difference lies in the absence of Ash Williams .
Bruce Campbell's portrayal in the original brings a human breaking point to the horror: fear, being overwhelmed, and later, black humor.
The 2013 film deliberately avoids this irony – it does not want to entertain, but to wear down .
This makes it more effective for modern audiences, but less iconic.
Occult context & Gothic reference
Both films share:
-
Forbidden books (Necronomicon)
-
Obsession & Dehumanization
-
Isolation as an amplifier of horror
But:
-
1981 → Occultism as incalculable chaos
-
2013 → Occultism as ritualized, inescapable damnation
Both are relevant to Gothic and Dark Art aesthetics, but with different emotional effects.
Conclusion
“Evil Dead” (2013) is not a replacement for the original – but a radical reinterpretation.
Where the classic is raw, creative and iconic, the reboot focuses on technical perfection and extreme consistency .
Those seeking atmosphere, madness, and cult status should go for the original.
Those who want modern, uncompromising horror will find a merciless experience in the reboot.
Evaluation:
-
Evil Dead (2013): 8/10 – brutal & effective
-
The Evil Dead (1981) : 10/10 – timeless cult classic
Prev post
Alien: Earth
Updated on 03 January 2026
Next post
Film review & comparison: Nosferatu
Updated on 03 January 2026